Menu

Hica / Category: Uncategorized

Many economists, businesspeople and political commentators state as an empirical fact that investment in the South African economy is plummeting, and that this is because of “bad” economic policy or a lack of coordination among the economic departments such as trade and industry, economic development, National Treasury and others.

Most recently, local billionaire Koos Bekker commented that “the biggest need is to develop a coherent economic policy and get everyone to sing from the same hymn sheet. Foreign investors need to take away a consistent message: we want your money; we want you to create jobs in this country; come join us and we’ll look after you.”

Bekker is at least partly right. A consistent message is indeed important for both foreign and domestic investors, and of course South Africa does compete with many other countries for investment. But this need for coordination was identified some years ago already, and is partly why government is structured into “clusters”.

The economic sectors, employment and infrastructure development cluster, for example, bring together 25 departments that have a role to play in economic policy. This cluster processes all economic policy, legislation and strategy issues, first at directors-general, ministers and Cabinet-committee level before being presented to the full Cabinet for consideration.

Nevertheless, where many economic policy commentators really seem to lose the plot is their presumption – often without reference to data – that investment levels in South Africa have been, or are, declining massively.

Given that the majority of both domestic and foreign investors proactively contact the department of trade and industry (the dti) – to apply for incentives, obtain Industrial Policy Action Plan support, licensing advice and a host of other government assistance – the department is uniquely positioned to provide an assessment of the investment environment based on the actual investments taking place on the ground.

It is this assessment, analysis of the official data and our many interactions with investors that lead us to confidently dispute the view that South Africa’s investment performance has been “dismal” or “disappointing”.

On a broad level, foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to South Africa doubled between 2012 and 2013, reaching an impressive $8.1 billion in 2013. Data for last year are not yet available, but early indications are that FDI levels may have moderated only slightly last year.

South Africa’s investment potential has also been assessed by the global consulting group AT Kearney, which in July 2014 announced that South Africa had jumped two places, to 13th, on its Foreign Direct Investment Confidence Index.

This index ranks South Africa as the 13th most attractive destination for FDI among 25 leading economic powerhouses, and it places us ahead of developed countries such as Switzerland, Spain, Japan and Italy.

In addition, International Investment Initiative director at the World Trade Institute Dr Stephen Gelb says his research shows that more than 130 foreign firms either entered South Africa or expanded their investments during 2013.

Another way of looking at this is more than two foreign firms invested or expanded their investment in South Africa every single week of the year.

It is therefore no surprise that a number of international organisations have recognised the economic opportunities in South Africa and the diligence with which government has marketed the country to foreign investors. This recognition includes the investment promotion unit of the dti being recognised by the UN Conference on Trade and Development as the global winner for attracting investments in sustainable development.

Shifting focus to domestic investment, the graphic at the top of this page shows South Africa’s performance over the past few years, which is still influenced by the lingering effects of the global financial crisis. The values are in constant rands so as to strip out the effect of inflation, and we see that domestic investment fell by a marginal 0.4% last year compared with 2013, while the overall five-year trend is unambiguously upward. That the popular press has sought to portray such a small decline last year as a crisis suggests that other agendas are at play.

Some commentators have argued that multinational corporations no longer see South Africa as an attractive investment destination. Yet last year, Unilever opened its R1.4 billion Indonsa plant in KwaZulu-Natal – one of the multinational’s largest investments anywhere in the world.

Next month, the company will open its multibillion-rand investment in its Khanyisa factory in Boksburg, which will produce Omo, Skip and Handy Andy. Similarly, in May last year, Mercedes-Benz launched its R5.4 billion investment to produce the new C-Class.

In the Coega Industrial Development Zone, President Jacob Zuma opened the First Automotive Works assembly plant on July 10 last year, while Iveco invested R800 million to produce buses for Putco. In renewable energy, Jinko Solar, a global leader, opened its factory in Epping, Western Cape, with an investment of R60 million.

Meanwhile, leading South African companies, such as Mondi, Sappi, Aspen, Grindrod and PG Glass, have continued to invest in local plants and factories, supported by the incentives provided by the dti.

These investments represent a small fraction of the foreign and domestic investments being made in South Africa daily. The opening of these plants and factories reveals the true investment opportunities available in South Africa in concrete terms.

These success stories have not made us complacent. We must continue to improve our investment environment to create the volume of jobs required to halve unemployment, as government has committed to doing.

Government must diligently implement the nine-point plan announced by President Zuma in his state of the nation address earlier this year, and we must continue to ensure that we coordinate our economic-policy interventions. If radical socioeconomic transformation and inclusive growth are our imperatives, then we must not allow ourselves to be diverted from the pursuit of structural change in South Africa’s economy.

Article Source: THE DTI

The Middle East/Africa region reported positive year-over-year results in two of the three major performance metrics during March 2015 when reported in U.S. dollars, according to data compiled by STR Global.

The region reported a 3.2-percent increase in occupancy to 68.7 percent and a 0.7-percent rise in revenue per available room to US$118.04. Average daily rate, however, decreased 2.3 percent to US$171.82.

When looking at the three Middle East/Africa sub-regions, Northern Africa posted the top increases in all three performance metrics when reported in U.S. dollars. The sub-region experienced a 15.1-percent increase in occupancy to 52.2 percent, an 8.9-percent increase in ADR to US$93.49 and a 25.3-percent rise in RevPAR to US$48.78.

Amongst the key countries in the region, Egypt experienced the highest increases in both ADR (+32.9 percent to US$86.64) and RevPAR (+61.5 percent to US$45.28).

Lebanon saw the highest increase in occupancy, up 27.0 percent to 48.5 percent. The country’s demand has increased for 11 consecutive months after the Gulf Cooperation Council lifted travel advisories in May 2014.

Morocco reported the steepest declines in both RevPAR (-23.4 percent to US$64.11) and ADR (-23.6 percent to US$109.83).

Click here to read more

Article Source: Hospitality Trends